More clients said they did not know about vasectomy than reported any opinion about it
at all. According to providers, many men still view vasectomy as castration. There are
also women who are opposed to their husbands undergoing vasectomy. A national
program manager, commenting on cultural issues, noted, “I think the problem is just the
attitude of our society as far as vasectomy is concerned, because I hear of cases where the
wife herself … refuses her partner to be done vasectomy. I think there is something not
known about the whole issue.” All of the three vasectomy users who were interviewed as
part of the assessment were pleased with the method. Regarding negative public opinion,
one vasectomy user, a 48-year-old father of four said, “After having gone for vasectomy,
people initially started saying that they now learnt to make use of my wife because [I] am
now castrated. But later…they started knowing the truth, and joined me.”
Male involvement
Many communities still view FP as a female issue, which does not involve men at all, but
providers, clients, and stakeholders interviewed for this assessment agreed that involving
more men in FP would help to increase uptake of FP in general, and LAPMs in particular.
While most women say their partners are involved in FP decision-making (AMKENI
85%, AMUA 89%), FP clinics are themselves not seen as “male friendly,” as a
respondent from FHI explains: “Vasectomy has remained low because providers offer
services to the men as if they are … just helping the men. The services are not male
friendly, and it is even referred to as the MCH clinic, so … it is basically for the mother
and child welfare, automatically locking the man out. There are even no clinics that are
specialized to deal with male problems like prostrate cancer or infertility.”
Though there have been many advances in gender equity in Kenya, men are still the
principal decision makers in all matters, including RH/FP. Many women still have
difficulty accessing FP services without their husbands’ approval. One 39-year-old
mother of six who received TL explained why she did not tell her husband about her
intention to use the method before she had the procedure: “I never told him. He knew
after I had already finished doing TL, because if I told him, he wouldn’t agree. And, you
know, a man wants many children. He’s never satisfied with children. He wants many
and yet he can’t take care of them.” The AMKENI project found that peer family
discussion groups could be very effective means of enabling family members to discuss
RH matters openly. In addition, open days, such as Mothers Days, Fathers Days or
community barazas, encouraged discussion around the ambivalence and dilemmas which
accompany the process of effecting behavioral change. As a result, the community
dialogue approach could be very effective in increasing fathers’ involvement in RH
decision making. One clinic in-charge said that they include FP messages in the health
talks they give to outpatient clients who have come to the clinic for treatment. Many of
these clients are men. Stakeholders in the ACQUIRE project reported that men became
much more involved in FP in Kisii District than they had in the past. Peer educators
reached an estimated 21,000 men. Many men listened and called into the Egesa radio
program to obtain more information about family planning. One Kisii District provider
noted that after she spoke about male engagement on the Egesa program, men came to
the clinic to talk to her.